[00/12] arm64: FF-A runtime transport for EFI variables
Harsimran Singh Tungal
harsimransingh.tungal at arm.com
Thu May 14 17:37:23 CEST 2026
On 2026-04-28 12:16 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Harsimran,
>
> On 2026-04-24T17:31:50, Harsimran Singh Tungal
> <harsimransingh.tungal at arm.com> wrote:
>
> > efi_loader: align FF-A cache maintenance with runtime path
>
> Patch 12 changes the boot-time path to match the runtime path, but
> sits at the end of the series. Between patch 3 (which introduces the
> runtime cache pattern) and patch 12 the two paths are deliberately
> inconsistent. I'd prefer this alignment before patch 3, so patch 3
> simply adopts the established pattern. It would also make the
> rationale in patch 12's commit message read more naturally. What do
> you think?
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
In v2, patch 12 is no longer required as ffa_mm_communicate() handles
both boot time and runtime capabilities. Patch 12 is eventually dropped
from v2. Patch 3 of v2 is now taking care of cache related changes.
Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20260514124924.1804332-1-harsimransingh.tungal@arm.com/
Regards
Harsimran Singh Tungal
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list