[PATCH v2 3/7] imx6: clock: allow different clock sources for ldb

[Brian Ruley]

On May 14, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of GE HealthCare. Only open links or attachments if you trust the sender. Report suspicious emails using Outlook’s “Report” button.
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 5:51 AM Brian Ruley
> <brian.ruley at gehealthcare.com> wrote:
> >
> > The LDB clock sources don't have to be the same, so allow DI1 clock to
> > be configured separately.
> >
> > Unlikely to be significant, but the reason will become apparent in the
> > following commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Ruley <brian.ruley at gehealthcare.com>
> 
> Once again, this series does not pass CI:
> 
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx/-/jobs/1450024
> 
> arm: + kp_imx6q_tpc
> +arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: u-boot-spl section `__u_boot_list' will not fit
> in region `.sram'
> +arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: region `.sram' overflowed by 200 bytes
> +arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6q.o: in function
> `imx6q_init_ldb_clks':
> +drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6q.c:271:(.text.imx6q_clk_probe+0x1458):
> undefined reference to `select_ldb_di_clock_source'
> +make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.xpl:546: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1
> +make[1]: *** [Makefile:2440: spl/u-boot-spl] Error 2
> +make: *** [Makefile:189: __sub-make] Error 2
> 
> For v3, please share a URL with a green CI pass; otherwise, I'll need
> to ignore it.

Apologies! 

I honestly did not believe there to be any issues anymore, and at the
time I did not have access to the GitLab CI, so I ran some additional
tests locally.

This was an error of judgement on my part, V3 will have a link to
passed CI.

Best regards,
Brian