[PATCH 6/6] board: variscite: add support for the omap4_var_som

[Bastien Curutchet]

Hi Tom

On 5/19/26 5:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 04:55:40PM +0200, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
>> Hi Tom
>>
>> On 5/19/26 4:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 08:45:43AM +0200, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
>>>
>>>> OMAP4 support is present but there isn't any board using it.
>>>>
>>>> Add minimal support for the Variscite OMAP4-SoM (debug console + boot
>>>> from SD card).
>>>> Use the ti/omap/omap4-var-stk-om44 device-tree from the Linux kernel. The
>>>> real representation of the SoM's hardware is located in
>>>> ti/omap/omap4-var-som-om44.dtsi included in it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet at bootlin.com>
>>> [snip]
>>>> diff --git a/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS b/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 00000000000..802059ea521
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>>> +ARM OMAP4 VARISCITE VAR-SOM-OM44 MODULE
>>>> +M:	Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet at bootlin.com>
>>>> +S:	Maintained
>>>> +F:	board/variscite/omap4_var_som
>>>> +F:	include/configs/omap4_var_som.h
>>>> +F:	configs/omap4_var_som_defconfig
>>>
>>> So this could all be caught with:
>>> N: omap4_var_som
>>>
>>
>> Ok
>>
>>> Which is my way of moving to the next topic, omap4 needs a maintainer
>>> too, if we're bringing it back.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I can also add myself in the omap4 maintainer then.
> 
> Thanks!
> 

How should it appear ? Shall I create an ARM TI OMAP4 section next to 
the ARM TI one ?


Best regards,
Bastien