[PATCH 2/3] efi_selftest: add ACPI configuration table test

Ilias Apalodimas ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org
Fri May 22 09:10:39 CEST 2026


Hi Heinrich,

[....]

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_acpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * efi_selftest_acpi
> + *
> + * Copyright 2026, Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> + *
> + * Check ACPI configuration table availability and root table presence.
> + */
> +
> +#include <efi_selftest.h>
> +#include <acpi/acpi_table.h>
> +
> +static const efi_guid_t acpi2_guid = EFI_ACPI_TABLE_GUID;
> +static const efi_guid_t acpi1_guid = EFI_GUID_EFI_ACPI1;
> +
> +/**
> + * efi_st_acpi_execute() - execute ACPI selftest
> + *
> + * Return: status code
> + */
> +static int efi_st_acpi_execute(void)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_rsdp *rsdp;
> +       struct acpi_table_header *table;
> +       u32 rsdt_addr32;
> +       u64 xsdt_addr64;
> +       uintptr_t rsdt_addr;
> +       uintptr_t xsdt_addr;
> +
> +       rsdp = efi_st_get_config_table(&acpi2_guid);
> +       if (!rsdp)
> +               rsdp = efi_st_get_config_table(&acpi1_guid);

Isn't having both RSDT and XSDT a valid case?
IOW the test looks fine, but wouldn't it be better to check for both
unconditionally?

[...]

Thanks
/Ilias


More information about the U-Boot mailing list