[U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next v2 1/1] OMAP3: igep00x0: add SPL support for IGEP-based boards

Javier Martinez Canillas javier at dowhile0.org
Thu Jul 19 10:18:06 CEST 2012


On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Enric Balletbò i Serra
<eballetbo at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/7/19 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at dowhile0.org>:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Enric Balletbò i Serra
>> <eballetbo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2012/7/19 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at dowhile0.org>:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
>>>> <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
>>>>> Le Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:15:17 +0200,
>>>>> Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at dowhile0.org> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> +void get_board_mem_timings(u32 *mcfg, u32 *ctrla, u32 *ctrlb, u32 *rfr_ctrl,
>>>>>> +             u32 *mr)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +     *mr = MICRON_V_MR_165;
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOOT_NAND
>>>>>> +     *mcfg = MICRON_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>>>>>> +     *ctrla = MICRON_V_ACTIMA_165;
>>>>>> +     *ctrlb = MICRON_V_ACTIMB_165;
>>>>>> +     *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought the NAND version of the IGEPv2 was capable of using the 200
>>>>> Mhz timings. At least, from the limited testing I had done, it seemed
>>>>> to work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you are right. I just tested the following patch on my NAND
>>>> version IGEPv2 and it seems to work just fine.
>>>>
>>>> Do you know if the OneNAND version also supports 200 MHz timings? If I
>>>> remember correctly the OMAP3730 version did but the OMAP3530 didn't.
>>>>
>>>> I guess Enric knows the answer :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Both memories can work at 200MHz, I guess the limitation is on the
>>> processor that is populated on the board. If the IGEP board comes with
>>> OMAP3530 should work at 166MHz, if comes with DM3730 can work at
>>> 200MHz.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>    Enric
>>
>> Hi Enric,
>>
>> That's what I remembered but I wasn't sure about it, thanks for the
>> clarification.
>>
>> What do you think about this patch then?
>>
>> diff --git a/board/isee/igep0020/igep0020.c b/board/isee/igep0020/igep0020.c
>> index 40436d6..a4d099a 100644
>> --- a/board/isee/igep0020/igep0020.c
>> +++ b/board/isee/igep0020/igep0020.c
>> @@ -77,15 +77,23 @@ void get_board_mem_timings(u32 *mcfg, u32 *ctrla,
>> u32 *ctrlb, u32 *rfr_ctrl,
>>  {
>>         *mr = MICRON_V_MR_165;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BOOT_NAND
>> -       *mcfg = MICRON_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>> -       *ctrla = MICRON_V_ACTIMA_165;
>> -       *ctrlb = MICRON_V_ACTIMB_165;
>> -       *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>> +       *mcfg = MICRON_V_MCFG_200(512 << 20);
>> +       *ctrla = MICRON_V_ACTIMA_200;
>> +       *ctrlb = MICRON_V_ACTIMB_200;
>> +       *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_200MHz;
>>  #else
>> -       *mcfg = NUMONYX_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>> -       *ctrla = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMA_165;
>> -       *ctrlb = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMB_165;
>> -       *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>> +       if (get_cpu_family() == CPU_OMAP34XX) {
>> +               *mcfg = NUMONYX_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>> +               *ctrla = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMA_165;
>> +               *ctrlb = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMB_165;
>> +               *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>> +
>> +       } else {
>> +               *mcfg = NUMONYX_V_MCFG_200(512 << 20);
>> +               *ctrla = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMA_200;
>> +               *ctrlb = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMB_200;
>> +               *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_200MHz;
>> +       }
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/board/isee/igep0030/igep0030.c b/board/isee/igep0030/igep0030.c
>> index 41a7548..4f8b645 100644
>> --- a/board/isee/igep0030/igep0030.c
>> +++ b/board/isee/igep0030/igep0030.c
>> @@ -64,15 +64,23 @@ void get_board_mem_timings(u32 *mcfg, u32 *ctrla,
>> u32 *ctrlb, u32 *rfr_ctrl,
>>  {
>>         *mr = MICRON_V_MR_165;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BOOT_NAND
>> -       *mcfg = MICRON_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>> -       *ctrla = MICRON_V_ACTIMA_165;
>> -       *ctrlb = MICRON_V_ACTIMB_165;
>> -       *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>> +       *mcfg = MICRON_V_MCFG_200(512 << 20);
>> +       *ctrla = MICRON_V_ACTIMA_200;
>> +       *ctrlb = MICRON_V_ACTIMB_200;
>> +       *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_200MHz;
>>  #else
>> -       *mcfg = NUMONYX_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>> -       *ctrla = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMA_165;
>> -       *ctrlb = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMB_165;
>> -       *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>> +       if (get_cpu_family() == CPU_OMAP34XX) {
>> +               *mcfg = NUMONYX_V_MCFG_165(512 << 20);
>> +               *ctrla = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMA_165;
>> +               *ctrlb = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMB_165;
>> +               *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_165MHz;
>> +
>> +       } else {
>> +               *mcfg = NUMONYX_V_MCFG_200(512 << 20);
>> +               *ctrla = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMA_200;
>> +               *ctrlb = NUMONYX_V_ACTIMB_200;
>> +               *rfr_ctrl = SDP_3430_SDRC_RFR_CTRL_200MHz;
>> +       }
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>  #endif
>
> Thanks Thomas for making this observation.
>
> Javier, the patch looks good for me. If we have the Numonyx OneNAND we
> should check if the processor is OMAP3530 or DM3730 and apply the
> correct timings. If we have the Micron NAND memory this check is not
> necessary because all boards with this memory uses DM3730.
>
> Cheers,
>    Enric

Hi Enric,

Great, I'll send a v2 with this modification to set the correct timings then.

Do you want me to preserve your Acked-by?

Best regards,
Javier


More information about the U-Boot mailing list