[U-Boot-Users] IVT on 405GP

Wolfgang Denk wd at denx.de
Wed Apr 16 22:46:53 CEST 2003

In message <EGEGIJHKDKJGAJMGIDPNOEPICKAA.jwalden at digitalatlantic.com> you wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I think my problem may be the base uboot address.
> The
> address is 0x3fcf000. The mask is 3fff. If my uboot started on a nice 16 bit
> address then the result would be 0(3fc0000 & 3fff) but I was getting
> 0xf000(3fcf000 & 3fff). So I think that the fix is to move uboot down to
> 0x3fc0000 or 0x3fc8000.

I have warned often enough NOT to try to start U-Boot from RAM unless
you know _EXACTLY_ what you are doing.

You tried, and you failed. You kind of got what you deserved ;-)

Put U-Boot in flash, and start it from the reset entry point like  it
was designed for, and everything will be fine.

Actually I have to admit that I don't remember why the target address
was computed using "& 3fff" instead of a hard-wired  0x100.  I  don't
even remember where I got this code fragment from.

A similar assumption is buried in the code  relocation  stuff  -  see
llandre's  problem  when setting CFG_MONITOR_BASE to a value that was
not a multiple of 16 k.

We probably should get rid of this ASAP.

Wolfgang Denk

Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
How does a project get to be a year late?      ... One day at a time.

More information about the U-Boot mailing list