[U-Boot-Users] BDI2000 not good for ARM946?
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Thu Aug 5 08:59:39 CEST 2004
Dear Shawn,
in message <c3d0340b040804134627e0e723 at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Some people using BDI2000 to bring up ARM946 board have a little
> complaint that BDI2000 works flakey on their board. (It took them a
> week to figure out its configuration file and sometimes it just simply
> doesn't work.)
It takes some understanding of the hardware to come up with a working
BDI2000 configuration file. And of course the stability of the system
BDI2000-target depends on _both_ components, the BDI2000 _and_ the
target.
My guess is that these people have little experience and/or flakey
target hardware.
> However my experience on ppc bring-up tells me that BDI2000 works
> perfectly. So I'm wondering if this is an individual case for ARM
> bring-up. Or BDI2000 for ARM is not as good as for PPC?
We use the BDI2000 on PowerPC, MIPS and ARM. I remember only one case
when a specific version of the firmware had problems (and this got
replaced by Abatron within a few hours). In all other cases the
BDi200 has proved to be absolutely reliable and stable. I see no
difference whether on ARM, MIPS or PowerPC.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
"I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid" - the artificial person,
from _Aliens_
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list