[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Part 1 of 2 MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch-1 for TLB/DDR
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Mon Jul 19 18:15:12 CEST 2004
Dear Jon,
in message <1090252402.10358.21.camel at blarg.somerset.sps.mot.com> you wrote:
>
> Right. The first message was rejected as being too large.
Oops? I received it through the list, and it made it into the
archives. I don't think it was rejected.
> I broke it into two parts that do the same patch and
> resubmitted it with a -1 and a -2 suffix.
So message 2 + message 3 is the same content as message 1?
> > The subject says "for TLB/DDR".
>
> Yes, I rewrote the TLB and DDR handling.
...and some other things, whichlook unrelated to me.
> > Changesets that contain different, unrelated modifications shall be
> > submitted as SEPARATE patches, one patch per changeset.
>
> They aren't really unreleated. For example, there were missing
> TLB entries for PCI address spaces that were added. The removal
> of the molding options was specifically to clean up the TLBs.
OK, but which of these has anything to do with that:
* Made MPC8540/8560ADS be 33Mhz PCI by default.
...
* Removed moldy CONFIG_RAM_AS_FLASH, CFG_FLASH_PORT_WIDTH_16
and CONFIG_L2_INIT_RAM options.
...
* Moved board specific PCI init parts out of CPU directory.
?
> > To make this short: which of your 3 messages shall be added?
>
> Please add all of them as they all apply and are important.
This makes NO sense to me. If I apply the first patch, the other two
(part 1 and 2) will not apply any more.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
"Summit meetings tend to be like panda matings. The expectations are
always high, and the results usually disappointing." - Robert Orben
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list