[U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?

[Robert Schwebel]

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
> 
> Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?

The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is
the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the
other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx. 

> Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does 
> and as it is printed on it?

mx1ads would be fine for me. 

> How are the plans for linux-2.6 port?
> We should keep it consistent...

I'll post our patch in five minutes...

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hornemannstraße 12,  31137 Hildesheim, Germany
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4