[U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?

[Steven Scholz]

Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> 
>>how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
>>
>>Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?
> 
> The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is
> the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the
> other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx. 

Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms _and_ speaking 
as a hardware developer I would vote for MC9328MX...
Or at least "iMX".

>>Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does 
>>and as it is printed on it?
> 
> 
> mx1ads would be fine for me. 

(see above) M93281ADS.

Anyone else? ;-)

Steven