[U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?

[llandre]

>>>how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
>>>
>>>Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?
>>The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is
>>the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the
>>other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx.
>
>Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms _and_ 
>speaking as a hardware developer I would vote for MC9328MX...
>Or at least "iMX".

I vote for MC9328MX{1,21,L}.


>>>Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does 
>>>and as it is printed on it?
>>
>>mx1ads would be fine for me.
>
>(see above) M93281ADS.

I think the best solution is to keep the name printed on the PCB 
(M9328MX1ADS / M9328MXLADS).



Regards,

llandre

DAVE Electronics System House - R&D Department
www.dave-tech.it