[U-Boot-Users] Problems with udelay() on AT91RM9200 !

[Steven Scholz]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> In message <41A1F410.6040107 at imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
> 
>>I just noticed that the implementation of udelay() - i.e udelay_masked() - 
>>resets the timer. Why is that?
> 
> Because of a bug?

Why didn't I think of this! ;-)

But seriously what's the point in letting the timer run with 40 or 80 MHz?
In my case udelay won't work for delays > 107ms anyway.... :-(

--
Steven