[U-Boot-Users] CLI over Ethernet
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Mon Nov 29 09:27:29 CET 2004
Dear C.R.Srivatsan,
in message <002901c4d5d0$c1447720$4501a8c0 at bgcw301> you wrote:
>
> There is indeed a requirement to have CLI over Ethernet using LLC. I
This may be a requirement for you, but please understand that it is a
non-requirement for U-Boot.
> wanted to know the best mechanism to provide CLI over Ethernet (Whether
> it is through UDP or through LLC). If it uses UDP then uboot already
> provides me with one alternatively if it uses LLC then it has to be
> rewritten.
I'm not sure if you actually mean what you say and how you say it, or
maybe it's my limited understanding of the English language which
makes me feel somewhat angry: this is free software, and instead of
being thankful for finding a powerful tool for free yoiu come up with
semi-mandatory staments like "there is a requirement" or "it has to
be rewritten." I would not like this tone if I was your subordinate,
which I definitely am not.
This is a free software poroject, so if you want to see it extended
you can either cointribute yourself by submitting patches, or you can
hire someone to implement what you want, but please do not expect
that everybody on this list starts hacking just because you feel you
have a requirement.
> I have one question to the uboot's design team, why was UDP chosen
> for CLI on Ethernet?
Why not? UDP is a common standard protocol. You can use existing
standard tools to receive and send UDP messages (see netcat). Most of
all, this way the implementation is compatible to the netconsole
implementation used by Linux, so we have a standard console protocol
for both U-Boot and Linux.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely re-
arranging their prejudices." - William James
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list