[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] CPM I/O port pin functions for MPC85xx

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <1121182110.17872.4.camel at cashmere.sps.mot.com> you wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 05:08, Fillod Stephane wrote:
> 
> > I would better cast my vote for the "CPM2 Config" and "MPC85XX ioports"
> > patches from Jon Loeliger.
...
> Good call.

Thanks.

> > Talking about MPC85xx patches, it looks like they're filtered out
> > in the U-Boot CVS while others patches still find their way. 
> 
> That's a good observation.  What is happening here and
> can I do something to "fix" or help the situation?

Nothing was filtered out, at least not intentionally.  Actualkly  all
my  patch  processing  came to a halt some time ago when I decided to
spend some time on thinking about more efficient ways for the  U-Boot
development cycle first. I think we will have a git tree soon. I just
need  a  little more exercise with all the new (and quickly changing)
tools.

> Indeed.  And in the meantime, it is causing me to have
> to hand-support multiple users as well.

I cannot parse that. What have multiple users to do with U-Boot?

> Any chance we can help get some of this resolved?
> Do we need to convert to GIT or so?  Would that help?

If you want you can go ahead and create  a  git  tree  from  the  CVS
server at SF, using something like

git cvsimport -d :pserver:anonymous at cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/u-boo -C u-boot u-boot

If you then provide an URL to pull from and indicate which patches in
my queue this bsoletes this might indeed  help.  Note  that  all  the
other  rules  for  patch  submission  are  still in place, and I will
definitely reject pulls for formal reasons.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
If I had to live my life again,  I'd  make  the  same  mistakes, only
sooner.                                          -- Tallulah Bankhead