[U-Boot-Users] booting elf images from flash
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Mon Mar 21 09:30:14 CET 2005
Dear Robin,
in message <6.1.1.1.0.20050320175615.01e43208 at ptg1.spd.analog.com> you wrote:
>
> The problem is after we make a distribution and fix the load points in SRAM
> - it limits the ability for end users to add or swap out our drivers
> without having to touch the source. It makes kernel config almost
> impossible for specific driver combinations.
This is a kernel design problem. And yes, it is a problem. But
strictly speaking this is off topic here. You should solve this in
the Linux kernel environment.
> If the linker handles it, the user only finds out if there is a problem
> with things if there is too much code allocated for SRAM.
Yes - but again, this only affects LInux, right?
> >objcopy should be capable of doing this - even if you probably don't
> >like the result ;-)
>
> It does actually error - with "File size limit exceeded"
I see. Maybe we should build it with LFS enabled :-)
> >U-Boot already understands how to deal with ELF images. It's just
> >that we don't use ELF images for the Linux kernel, as there is no
> >need to do so, and no advantages (but several disadvantages).
>
> I would be interested in your thoughts of why booting elf images is a
> disadvantage. We do it all the time, and have not run into any problems.
Bigger images, slower boot times, bigger U-Boot image.
> >Just assume that some other boot loader will be used to
> >boot your Linux kernel images.
>
> the only boot loader that we support right now - is U-Boot, and the on-chip
> ROM bootloader (which also boots elf images)...
Other users might want to use other boot loaders...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Q: Why do PCs have a reset button on the front?
A: Because they are expected to run Microsoft operating systems.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list