[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Dec 4 18:32:30 CET 2006

On Dec 2, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> In message <CF774E5E-8B40-432B-A6CE-A0788CE20BF3 at gmail.com> you wrote:
>> There's a commit with a bunch of 834x related fixes which totally  
>> broke
>> the board port.
>> I understand that the main code is volatile, but it seems there's a
>> blatant
>> disregard of keeping up a minimum of backwards compatibility.
>> If someone changes code that's supporting a bunch of board ports,  
>> please
>> put in some default macros to ensure past behaviour is preserved.
> Yes, it would be nice if everybody would work this way, but you know
> how things are going.
> On the other hand, the merge of the 83xx code has been discussed here
> for a *long* time - you could have raised your concerns a  long  time
> ago.  I  can't  help  it if you don't participate in this discussions
> and/or help testing new code.
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang Denk

I have a patch to remove CONFIG_MPC8349 since its redundant with  
CONFIG_MPC834X and CONFIG_MPC834X makes more sense to me.

- k

More information about the U-Boot mailing list