[U-Boot-Users] Re: Problem with the cfi flash driver with a x8/x16 flash configuredinx8 mode.
tlopez at aotek.es
Thu Jan 12 17:42:57 CET 2006
Alex BASTOS wrote:
>>Does anybody test the cfi flash driver (cfi_flash.c) with a x8/x16
>>flash configured in x8 mode ? I'm trying to port U-Boot for a Lite5200B
>>with a S29GL128N flash (CFI compliant) using the cfi flash driver.
>>U-Boot detects the flash correctly but It's unable to erase or write the
>>flash. In my case the following patch fix the bug but I'm not completly
>>sure If It's only a bug with my configuration. Any suggestions? Could
>>anybody test the patch in other architecture?
>I think your topic is very similar to this recent one:
OK, I've checked it.
>and previous similar patches have been submited and are still
>pending (but it seems they are coming, read the whole thread)
But not the patch that Wolfgang proposed, isn'it?
>So, yes, til now cfi_flash didn't support x8 mode for AMD chips,
>but it will.
I think the patch that Wolfgang proposed could be like that. I've tested
it with a S29GL128N x8/x16 in x8 mode. It works fine. But I have no idea
what would happen in x16 mode or others modes. I haven't the hardware
to check it.
--- ../tmp/u-boot/drivers/cfi_flash.c 2006-01-12 12:22:08.000000000 +0100
+++ drivers/cfi_flash.c 2006-01-12 17:21:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -107,9 +107,10 @@
#define AMD_STATUS_TOGGLE 0x40
#define AMD_STATUS_ERROR 0x20
-#define AMD_ADDR_ERASE_START 0x555
-#define AMD_ADDR_START 0x555
-#define AMD_ADDR_ACK 0x2AA
+#define AMD_ADDR_ERASE_START (0xAAA >> (info->portwidth-1))
+#define AMD_ADDR_START (0xAAA >> (info->portwidth-1))
+#define AMD_ADDR_ACK (0x555 >> (info->portwidth-1))
#define FLASH_OFFSET_CFI 0x55
#define FLASH_OFFSET_CFI_RESP 0x10
Jose Maria Lopez.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 427 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060112/2e17762a/attachment.vcf
More information about the U-Boot