[U-Boot-Users] Building U-Boot without cmd_ide.c?
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Wed Jul 12 01:28:40 CEST 2006
In message <44B42D5E.6080603 at freescale.com> you wrote:
> I'm working on providing support for the 8349e-mITX, which is another 8349 variant. I'm taking some old patches for U-Boot 1.1.3 and porting them to the latest code. Unfortunately, I don't know a whole lot about the 8349 or U-Boot, so this is a diffic
> ult task.
May I ask why you use old, obsolete code? Please use the current
version (i. e. top of git repo) instead.
> What I have so far won't boot at all. I power on the system and nothing happens. Obviously, I have no idea what's wrong.
Use a debugger?
> The reason these CFG_ATA_xxxx options are undefined is because they
> only get defined if CONFIG_COMPACT_FLASH is defined. Is there a
> reason why cmd_ide.c is being compiled? Do I really need it? Should I
Most probably you have enabled IDE support in your board config file...
And please don't ask *us* if *you* need it. Or, if you ask, the answer
has obviously to be: no, you don't.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Q: What is "SMOORPLAY"?
A: It's what SMURFS do before they SMUCK, of course!
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list