[U-Boot-Users] skipping bad blocks when erasing nand

[David Byron]

On Friday, July 14th, Wolfgang Denk wrote:	 

> I tend to agree here, which was the reason that I said I was  willing
> to  accept  the patch, but that at least the printf() shoould be kept
> so that the user gets the warning.

Sorry for the delay.  Here's a patch that lets the erase continue, but does
print a message.

-DB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: nand_base.c.patch.2
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 939 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060717/eca54814/attachment.obj