[U-Boot-Users] usb storage class CTL timeout problem

Lin Hungwen-RA8614 Winston.Lin at freescale.com
Thu May 18 15:46:18 CEST 2006

Hi Wolfgang,

I can't speak for all u-boot development effort within Freescale.  But
as for our small development team here, stability is more important.  If
we do see the need or have the time for moving on to the newer version,
we will proceed as we may need to in this case. 

Thank you,


Winston Lin
Systems/Applications Developer
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
phone: (512) 895-6218
email: winston.lin at freescale.com
-----Original Message-----
From: wd at denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de] 
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 2:19 AM
To: Lin Hungwen-RA8614
Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] usb storage class CTL timeout problem 

In message
<BE1D02A7E1D3DB4DB2787F2D3E1EDEDE67B68F at az33exm23.fsl.freescale.net> you
>  I have not... We have been using 1.1.3 as the code basis for our 
> current u-boot development and releases.  But I will be downloading 
> the

May I ask why Freescale uses old  and  obsolete  code  as  basis  for
current   development   and  releases?  This  iseems  pretty  contra-
productive to me.

For example, I'm pretty frustrated that Freescale releases  old  code
for  the  MPC8349EMDS  board  which completely ignores, and partially
duplicates, all efforts or Kumar Gala and DENX for these boards.

This is a waste of effort, and bad service to your customers.

> 1.1.4 and do a diff on the ohci driver for the mpc5200 processor.

Please use top-of-tree.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The IQ of the group is the lowest IQ of a member of the group divided by
the number of people in the group.

More information about the U-Boot mailing list