[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Define upmconfig() for 834x systems

[Timur Tabi]

Ben Warren wrote:

> I understand your reluctance to accept code that's not used by any of
> the eval boards and SBCs that are part of the distribution.  There are
> many reasons for taking this approach.

I'm working on a patch for the ITX that includes this change, as Wolfgang requested, so it's no big deal.

> A crazy idea that I'm sure has been shot down before, but have you ever
> considered making an 'unstable' branch available?  It could contain all
> patches that pass the coding standards and perhaps a week of feedback.
> If there was a big flashing sign that says "Use at your own risk", you
> could offload the "RTFM" responses to others on the list, giving
> yourself more time to move patches from unstable to stable.

I think that's just going to make more work for Wolfgang and not solve any real problems.  Patches aren't completely independent of each other - sooner or later he's going to get patches that apply to one tree but not the other.

Anyone who's really interested in unapplied patches can scan the mailing list archives.


-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale