[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Define upmconfig() for 834x systems

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Timur,

in message <4505A28B.9010909 at freescale.com> you wrote:
> 
> I think that's just going to make more work for Wolfgang and not
> solve any real problems. Patches aren't completely independent of

Oh well, it does. Actually this  is  what  I'm  doing  all  the  time
internally. I just need to decide (a) if I want to make such branches
publickly available in general (versus in special cases as we already
do  with  the  USB  and  NAND  testing branches), (b) what's the most
efficient way for me is to deal with such a  configuration,  and  (c)
what could be done to get more feedback about test results from board
maintainers.

> each other - sooner or later he's going to get patches that apply to
> one tree but not the other.
> 
> Anyone who's really interested in unapplied patches can scan the mailing list archives.

Umm... I disagree. Having the patches available in a git  repo  where
you  can  pull  and/or  cherry-pick  from  is much more effcient than
having to deal with email messages, where patches come in a  plethora
of different formats, often in many parts and sub-parts, or combinbed
as patches plus tarballs, or whatever.

IN theory, our patch tracking system should jump in  here  and  allow
for  easy  scanning of open and applied patches, but again this takes
more time than planned.

I apologize for this.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
To know how another being, another creature feels -  that  is  impos-
sible.                  - Terry Pratchett, _The Dark Side of the Sun_