[U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

On 2/12/07, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf at atmel.com> wrote:
> >> It really does not make sense to test his patches only
> >> on boards which does not use the dataflash.
> >
> > If that's all he has, then he has no other choice.
>
> He has always the choice of realizing that he maybe should
> leave this possible improvement to someone capable of testing it
> and concentrate on stuff which he can test.

Yeah, that's a nice attitude. "Go away, we don't want your patches."
Without even looking at them?

Btw, I can't help but feel that you're using me as an example here,
since I _did_ at one point suggest that one particular patch would
only need compile-testing. If you are, please stop it because you're
misrepresenting what I said.

Haavard