[U-Boot-Users] U-Boot-NG ?

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Tue Jul 3 21:21:10 CEST 2007


On 7/3/07, Rune Torgersen <runet at innovsys.com> wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely
> > On 7/3/07, Rune Torgersen <runet at innovsys.com> wrote:
> > Other than effort required; any objection to changing that approach?
> >
>
> I personally believe that the terminal output capabilities of U-Boot (ie
> having serial or other output almost as soon as you can run C code) is
> one of the biggest strong points of u-boot, and are very useful when
> doing a board bringup or debugging non-working boards.
> Changing that would be a mistake on my opinion (even for reducing code
> size/complexity).

Sorry; let me be more specific; any objection to moving device
initialization to *after* relocation to RAM.  I'm not asking about
removing console output.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195




More information about the U-Boot mailing list