[U-Boot-Users] U-Boot-NG ?

[Grant Likely]

On 7/4/07, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> Don't get me wrong. I generally like this 2 stage approach. For example it
> fits the NAND booting support (see nand_spl/*) where a small (4k on 4xx)
> first stage loader is needed. I'm just a little hesitant about dropping the
> full featured printf in early boot stages.

Then let's defer that discussion.  I'd like to drop printf; but there
are some pretty light printf implementations out there.  Or, we could
easily use a cutdown printf which only supports %i and %x if need be.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195