[U-Boot-Users] U-boot refactoring

[Jon Loeliger]

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 14:11, Carsten Schlote wrote:
> Hi Grant,
> 
> > each invasive change.  Thoughts?  I also think that Jon's CONFIG_
> > changes should probably be merged first, and as soon as possible.
> 
> Yes, these CFG_ defines are real show blockers. Getting rid of them in
> all board headers could really simplify the integration of kconfig.
> 
> CFG_ defines can be everywhere else in the source, as long as they are
> non defined or changed by a user. 
> 
> With all user-configurable defines starting with CONFIG_ we can start
> with the rest :-)


Say....  Not to put _too_ fine a spin on this, but there
is a _veeery_ similar issue brewing with the POST CFG_ symbols...

jdl