[U-Boot-Users] Question about CFG_ENV_ADDR during RAMBOOT
ladis at linux-mips.org
Wed May 23 13:39:27 CEST 2007
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:48:20PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Things are broken, because Wolfgang refuses patches fixing problems on AT91 on principle.
> Removing support will cause more work for people
> because the existing patches to make things work
> will have to be modified...
Wolfgang is waiting for custodian to comment on patch. So far nothing
happened. Please note that I'm the last one who wants to see support of
this board removed. Also I'm all for applying patches you send to the
mailing list (that serie 1,2,3,4,6,7,10,24) except for 24.noflash
which seems a bit hackish (and yes I run into the very same problem this
patch is trying to solve recently). If there is anything I can do to
help them to get applied, just let me know.
> What is the point of sabotaging others peoples efforts???
Removing non working code makes whole codebase cleaner. Sabotage is
leaving non working code in repository without any will to at least
consider applying patches... Anyway, who is responsible for AT91 code?
More information about the U-Boot