[U-Boot-Users] Question about CFG_ENV_ADDR during RAMBOOT
ladis at linux-mips.org
Thu May 24 11:14:13 CEST 2007
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:44:53PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > In message <002601c79d29$4da6de70$3125b10a at atmel.com> you wrote:
> > Just because others don't agree with you does not mean the sabotage
> > you. Robert Schwebel and others tried to explain this to you before.
> Disagreement with me is not sabotage, but I consider removing "board/at91rm9200dk"
> just because it does not work, sabotage.
> It forces additional work on me, and I fail to see any advantage.
I proposed removing board/at91rm9200dk just because noone was able to
review patch I sent. Here is reference:
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:37:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix U-Boot base address depending on CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
I have strong feeling (based on zero interest I received), that noone is
interested in this board and therefore it is safe to remove support for
it. Got my point?
More information about the U-Boot