[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix compilation problem for mpc8349itx CFG_RAMBOOT
Jerry Van Baren
gerald.vanbaren at smiths-aerospace.com
Thu May 24 14:49:40 CEST 2007
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Nikita,
>
> in message <200705241210.19623 at zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> you wrote:
>>> * all commands except foo, bar and baz
>> #include "define_all_cmds.h"
>> #undef CONFIG_CMD_FOO
>> #undef CONFIG_CMD_BAR
>> #undef CONFIG_CMD_BAZ
>>
>>> * all default commands plus foo, but without baz
>> #include "define_default_cmds.h"
>> #define CONFIG_CMD_FOO
>> #undef CONFIG_CMD_BAZ
>>
>>> I guess then you will have to list up all commands you want to
>>> include somewhere - either in the board onfig file or in another
>>> header file.
>> Sure - in separate headers files. I see no problems here. It scales.
>
> Good idea. Shall we go for that?
>
> Any other opinions, ACKs or NACKs?
>
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang Denk
Just to poke the sleeping lions, :-) we've discussed going to a linux
kconfig "script" in the past and was not pursued for various reasons,
most of which I've forgotten. It has some nice features
* Help text
* Conditional logic to guard against nonsensical configurations
Should we reconsider it?
I believe the above is compatible with kconfig, the missing part being
piles and piles of configuration snippets that would have to be written.
Anybody with more knowledge than me? (OK, that last was rhetorical. ;-)
Best regards,
gvb
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list