[U-Boot-Users] FW: [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm

[Peter Pearse]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Pearse [mailto:peter.pearse at arm.com] 
> Sent: 17 April 2008 15:25
> To: 'Dirk Behme'
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.behme at googlemail.com]
> > Sent: 17 April 2008 15:22
> > To: Peter Pearse
> > Cc: wd at denx.de; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm
> > 
> > Peter Pearse wrote:
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: wd at denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de]
> > >>Sent: 11 April 2008 14:18
> > >>To: Peter Pearse
> > >>Cc: 'Guennadi Liakhovetski'; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > >>Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm
> > >>
> > >>In message <000301c89bd0$21749350$3a4d010a at Emea.Arm.com> 
> you wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> 
> > >>>
> > >>>>Actually, I think, even Peter should not reset his tree,
> > >>
> > >>but revert
> > >>
> > >>>>just as well as you are going to do it: his tree is publically 
> > >>>>accessible too, and if he resets his tree, it will become
> > >>
> > >>unclear,
> > >>
> > >>>>where respective commits from the central tree come from.
> > >>>
> > >>>Agreed.
> > >>>
> > >>>I shall revert u-boot-arm commits in the order listed.
> > >>
> > >>OK, I reverted the commits in the master branch now.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > And I've reverted u-boot-arm
> > 
> > What's the status of re-applying the reverted patches?
> > 
> > I really like to see
> > 
> > [PATCH v2] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and 
> > cleanup
> > 
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/38505
> > 
> > in mainline.
> > 
> > Sorry if I missed anything,
> 
> Dirk
> 	Sorry, I'm still sorting my mail system.
> 
> 	Perhaps another ARM guardian could pick it up.
> Regards
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> > 
> > Dirk
> >