No subject

wouldn't complain if it isn't as the code is correct.

Regards,

Richard W.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net 
> [mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> Of George G. Davis
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:33 AM
> To: Cam
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] tiny patch for examples/Makefile 
> (objcopy related)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cam wrote:
> > Hello u-boot-users,
> > 
> > Here is a short patch for the examples/Makefile. This improves
> > reliability in the case of a deficient toolchain.
> > 
> > For example the MontaVista (pro 3.0) ppc_82xx objcopy does 
> not accept
> > srec input, and produces an empty output file which can 
> confuse make.
> 
> Yep, I had noticed this long ago too. Why not just add "-I 
> srec" as in the attached?
> 
> --
> Regards,
> George
> 
> > 
> > This patch ensures that the binary image is produced from 
> the elf file
> > and not the srec file, which allows a clean build.
> > 
> > -Cam
> > 
> > PS. MontaVista have 'no general interest in supporting srec input'
> > because of 'how little information srec files contain'.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > 
> > diff -urN u-boot-1.0.0.orig/examples/Makefile 
> u-boot-1.0.0/examples/Makefile
> > --- u-boot-1.0.0.orig/examples/Makefile	2003-10-14 
> 20:43:56.000000000 +0100
> > +++ u-boot-1.0.0/examples/Makefile	2003-12-03 
> 11:21:04.000000000 +0000
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
> >  	$(OBJCOPY) -O srec $(<:.o=) $@
> >  
> >  %.bin:	%.srec
> > -	$(OBJCOPY) -O binary $< $@ 2>/dev/null
> > +	$(OBJCOPY) -O binary $(<:.srec=) $@ 2>/dev/null
> >  
> >  
> > 
> ##############################################################
> ###########
> >  
>