[U-Boot-Users] Fwd: RFC: U-Boot version numbering
Andrew Dyer
amdyer at gmail.com
Fri Aug 1 17:40:08 CEST 2008
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrew Dyer <amdyer at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: U-Boot version numbering
To: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> If we go to date based versions. I'd prefer we keep year as 4 digits:
>
> v1.2008.10
> v1.2009.01
I agree, although doing that makes the third field look like a month
to the uninitiated. Perhaps use a letter like 'r' for revision
instead of a period for the second separator like so:
v1.2008r06
--
Hardware, n.:
The parts of a computer system that can be kicked.
--
Hardware, n.:
The parts of a computer system that can be kicked.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list