[U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem
Haavard Skinnemoen
hskinnemoen at atmel.com
Tue Jan 29 10:12:27 CET 2008
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:29:38 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > I'd really like to see a common layer for SPI flash though, so I don't
> > mean to criticise your effort. But it would be nice if not every new
> > SPI client came with its own low-level SPI functions...
>
> i know exactly where you're coming from, so dont sweat it. my purpose was to
> get things integrated and then take a look at the existing pieces and unify
> them. easier i think to have known working code to throw at a common
> framework than code for hypothetical uses we cant actually break our teeth
> on.
Ok, don't worry about it then. I just wanted to make sure you
investigate the API(s) we already have before you propose something
new.
So let's just make "please use the include/spi.h API for low-level SPI
access" be one of the comments on your RFC :-)
Haavard
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list