[U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done

[Kim Phillips]

On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:05:40 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:

> * We have incompatible definitions of the CPU_TYPE_ENTRY for MPC83xx
>   systems:
>   	
>   In "include/asm-ppc/processor.h":
> 
> 	 973 #define CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(n, v) \
> 	 974         { .name = #n, .soc_ver = SVR_##v, }
> 
>   But in "cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c":
> 
> 	 47 #define CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(x) {#x, SPR_##x}
> 
>   This causes ``"CPU_TYPE_ENTRY" redefined'' warnings that need to get
>   fixed.
> 
>   -> for MPC83xx custodian
> 
you have already pulled a fix for this (commit
4890246a2c5df90a74e2941e3673a49bbd36aee9).

>  3564  06/09 Kim Phillips       [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt_support: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors
>  3621  06/10 Kumar Gala         Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt_support: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors
>  3630  06/10 Kim Phillips       [PATCH v2] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3,5}xxE processors
>  3631  06/10 Jerry Van Baren    Re: [PATCH v2] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3,5}xxE processors
>  3895  06/16 Kim Phillips       [PATCH v3] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3,5}xxE processors
>  3896  06/16 Kim Phillips       [PATCH v4] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors
>  3925  06/17 Kumar Gala         Re: [PATCH v4] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors
> 	-> asked submitter about state: resubmit cleaned up version?

I responded to your query in that thread; please go ahead and apply v4
as Kumar's comments are addressed in a separate (85xx) patch.

>  3935  06/17 Kim Phillips       [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] mpc83xx: move CPU_TYPE_ENTRY over to processor.h
> 	-> for 83xx custodian

you have already pulled this (same commit as above).

Kim