[U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done

[Rune Torgersen]

u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Open question:
>> 
>> * Are CFG_64BIT_LBA and CONFIG_LBA48 kind of redundant?
>>   At least it seems that CONFIG_LBA48 requires CFG_64BIT_LBA to be
>>   set or we will have problems due to insufficient size of the data
>> types. 

Ok, I see. CFG_64BIT_LBA is somewhat redundant. The 64bit prints are
(and sector reads from command line) are protected by different define's
Taking off CFG_64BIT_LBA and making the secrtor number always a 64bit
should be perfectly fine.
And we're quickly approaching the 2.1TB limit a 32bit lba has anyways.