[U-Boot-Users] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <200806011654.55700.vapier at gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > * Major problem: only changes should be used in custodian trees and
> >   submitted as part of a pull request, that had been submitted to the
> >   mailing list before, and for whioch at least no negative comments
> 
> all of them have been posted.  i dont know why you cant find them.  in fact, 
> you responded to about half of them already.

I expect that the entry in the pull request match the subject of some
posting. Is this not the case? If so, why not?


> > 04/18 Mike Frysinger     [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: overhaul
> > i2c driver
> >
> > Status: change request from Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, no
> > feedback ever sent.
> 
> i implemented his suggestions

You did not repost a cleaned up patch?

> > 04/19 Mike Frysinger     [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Blackfin: implement
> > go/boote wrappers
> >
> > Status: rejected by me. Discussion stopped on 04/21.
> 
> stopped by you as well.  i already explained why the current behavior is 
> broken for Blackfin.  a poorly performing system is more desirable than a 
> broken/crashing one.

So the status quo is that I rejected this patch. Why do you think you
could it add to the repo?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
GUIs  are  virtually  useless.  Learn  tools.  They're  configurable,
scriptable, automatable, cron-able, interoperable, etc. We don't need
no brain-dead winslurping monolithic claptrap.
                               -- Tom Christiansen in 371140df at csnews