[U-Boot-Users] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git

[Mike Frysinger]

On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <200806011654.55700.vapier at gentoo.org> you wrote:
> > > * Major problem: only changes should be used in custodian trees and
> > >   submitted as part of a pull request, that had been submitted to the
> > >   mailing list before, and for whioch at least no negative comments
> >
> > all of them have been posted.  i dont know why you cant find them.  in
> > fact, you responded to about half of them already.
>
> I expect that the entry in the pull request match the subject of some
> posting. Is this not the case? If so, why not?

i really have no idea what you're referring to

> > > 04/18 Mike Frysinger     [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin:
> > > overhaul i2c driver
> > >
> > > Status: change request from Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, no
> > > feedback ever sent.
> >
> > i implemented his suggestions
>
> You did not repost a cleaned up patch?

to "fix" whitespace ?  no, i didnt

> > > 04/19 Mike Frysinger     [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Blackfin: implement
> > > go/boote wrappers
> > >
> > > Status: rejected by me. Discussion stopped on 04/21.
> >
> > stopped by you as well.  i already explained why the current behavior is
> > broken for Blackfin.  a poorly performing system is more desirable than a
> > broken/crashing one.
>
> So the status quo is that I rejected this patch. Why do you think you
> could it add to the repo?

you rejected based on a misunderstanding of what the purpose of the change
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080601/7633ac6c/attachment.pgp