[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: add support for BF538/BF539

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Mike,

in message <200806041616.40360.vapier at gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > To be honest, as far as I can see, all other architectures get by
> > without such "macros" without loosing anything and the arguments you
> > gave this far did not convince me that they are needed.
> 
> other arches do not have a central control of the architecture and allow any 
> random group out there to create their own.  these headers provide API 
> compatibility across all Blackfin compilers and projects.

I hope I'm misinterpreting you - but to me  that  sounds  as  if  you
consider  peer review that eliminates bogus code and tries to come up
with better solutions a bad  thing?  Because  you  have  to  give  up
"central control", i. e. the ability to write the code exactly as you
think it should be done?

Please tell me that you do NOT think that this code  is  so  good  so
that  no  peer review on it is allowed because it would only ruin the
superior quality of it...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Anyone can count the seeds in an apple.
No one can count the apples in a seed.