[U-Boot-Users] [Patch 2/4] U-Boot-V2: ARM: introduce CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATION
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu May 8 09:26:04 CEST 2008
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20080507152912.GJ4326 at pengutronix.de> you wrote:
> >
> > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE on powerpc means something different. On arm we start
> > U-Boot by running it at an address != link address and _copy_ (not
> > relocate) ourselves to the address we are linked at. On powerpc real
> > relocation is done if CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is enabled.
> > Hence the option you wanted to add should better have the name
> > CONFIG_SKIP_COPY_TO_SDRAM or something like that.
>
> This is something that I always wanted to fix. The ARM implementation
> is broken by design - unfortunately it has been also used for MIPS,
> and other architectures. It would be much better if we had real
> relocation to a (dynamically determined) address on ARM too, instead
> of such a fixed mapping.
I wouldn't say broken. With a fixed mapping you get smaller code size
and for many cases it's just enough. So I vote for having both.
Regards
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
-----------------------------------------------------------
Kontakt-Informationen finden Sie im Header dieser Mail oder
auf der Webseite -> http://www.pengutronix.de/impressum/ <-
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list