[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mpc83xx: New board support SIMPC8313

[Scott Wood]

Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:44:18 -0800 (PST)
> Ron Madrid <ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> This would allow for more board specific nand_spl boot code.
>> Would something like this be allowed or am I barking up the
>> wrong tree?
> 
> I'd rather we find stuff that can be ifdeffed out or moved elsewhere -

That's great if it's possible, but it's a very tight image and we're 
currently wasting 1/16 of it.

> the moment we move something in there, someone will find the need to
> enhance and grow whatever moved there.

So put something in there that is unlikely to grow, and if it does grow, 
swap it with something else.  I think you've gotten spoiled by the lack 
of resource constraints. :-)

> what was the 4.2 toolchain doing differently than the 4.1 toolchain?
> maybe that's an area worth looking into.

Agreed, code size regressions with -Os should warrant a bug report.

-Scott