[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc86xx: use r4 instead of r2 in lock_ram_in_cache and unlock_ram_in_cache

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Nick Spence,

In message <12199577553905-git-send-email-nick.spence at freescale.com> you wrote:
> This is needed in unlock_ram_in_cache() because it is called from C and
> will corrupt the small data area anchor that is kept in R2.
> 
> lock_ram_in_cache() is modified similarly as good coding practice, but
> is not called from C.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Spence <nick.spence at freescale.com>
> ---
>  cpu/mpc86xx/start.S |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
GUIs  are  virtually  useless.  Learn  tools.  They're  configurable,
scriptable, automatable, cron-able, interoperable, etc. We don't need
no brain-dead winslurping monolithic claptrap.
                               -- Tom Christiansen in 371140df at csnews