[U-Boot] fsl_elbc_nand.c and nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c for large page devices
Ron Madrid
ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net
Thu Oct 16 23:05:03 CEST 2008
So is there a particular convention for which bytes should be used within the OOB area for an ECC? I've looked for information on this but haven't been able to come up with anything.
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> From: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] fsl_elbc_nand.c and nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c for large page devices
> To: "Ron Madrid" <ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 12:17 PM
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 01:24:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> > 1. I don't see anywhere that the AL (address
> length, or number of
> > address cycles) can be set to anything other than 2.
> It appears to be
> > hard coded in both files.
>
> Correct. AFAICT, setting AL to anything less than 2 is
> just an
> optimization for small flashes. Linux will make that
> optimization, but
> the way NAND devices are currently probed in u-boot makes
> that awkward
> (no opportunity to run code after size is known, but before
> nand_scan_tail).
>
> > 2. nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c uses ECCM = 1 for large page
> devices, but I
> > don't see a place where fsl_elbc_nand.c sets ECCM
> to 1 for similar
> > devices.
>
> That looks like a bug.
>
> -Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list