[U-Boot] [PATCH][RFC] Update U-Boot's build timestamp on every compile
Peter Tyser
ptyser at xes-inc.com
Tue Oct 21 21:03:06 CEST 2008
Hi Andy,
> I don't think he's wanting this as much for releases (which would be
> fine with the git id as you mentioned), but during the development
> process. It is very useful during development to have a timestamp
> which confirms that what you are running now is what you expect.
> There are various ways I have used this:
>
> * Catch that I failed to copy the new image to my tftp directory
> * Confirm that I'm booting from the flash bank I just programmed
> * Helpful for figuring out which of the files in my tftp directory
> corresponds to what's running
100% agree - all our releases are generated from fully-committed git
trees with tags. This patch only intends to improve development.
> Also, while I can see good arguments for not having a time stamp,
> having one that is not up-to-date seems totally useless. The stamp
> might not be updated for months, and thus provides only an indicator
> as to when the date was last updated.
>
> Upshot: I endorse this patch's concept, and urge Peter to put in his
> (apparently underpaid) time to complete it. :)
I'll submit a patch shortly. I'll also mention the underpaid comment to
management and see what comes of that;)
Peter
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list