[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] iMX31: Add support to iMX31PDK board boots from NAND Flash
Fabio Estevam
fabioestevam at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 23 01:53:18 CEST 2008
Magnus,
--- On Wed, 10/22/08, Magnus Lilja <lilja.magnus at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Magnus Lilja <lilja.magnus at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] iMX31: Add support to iMX31PDK board boots from NAND Flash
> To: "Wolfgang Denk" <wd at denx.de>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de, "Alan Carvalho de Assis" <alan.assis at freescale.com>
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 4:52 PM
> 2008/10/22 Magnus Lilja <lilja.magnus at gmail.com>:
> > Wolfgang,
> >
> >
> > 2008/10/22 Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>:
> >> Dear Magnus,
> >>
> >> In message
> <59b21cf20810221148u7afd8e19h148b496234b79274 at mail.gmail.com>
> you wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've updated the patch and it now almost
> compiles. There's a problem
> >>> at the last link stage where gnu-ld complains
> about multiple __udivsi3
> >>> definitions and incompatible EABI formats (see
> below, modulo gmail
> >>> wrapping).
> >>
> >> Try this patch which I posted today:
> >> ARM: Use do_div() instead of division for
> "long long".
> >
> > That patch doesn't seem to touch any files that
> are involved in
> > building i.MX31 boards. I might try the equivalent
> change though.
> > Although it is a bit puzzling that I can build the
> i.MX31 Litekit
> > board with the same toolchain.
>
> Ok, I've found what's triggering this. The PDK
> board has
> CONFIG_MX31_CLK32=32768 while Litekit has
> CONIFG_MX31_CLK32=32000.
> That difference nowadays causes problems when linking, I
> suppose that
> happened after the merging of
> CONFIG_MX31_TIMER_HIGH_PRECISION.
>
> Changing the TICK_TO_TIME macro in
> arm1176/mx31/interrupts.c to a
> construction that uses do_div() solves the problem.
>
> I don't have the PDK schematics here but since I
> decided to set CLK32
> to 32768 I suppose the board uses that frequency.
Yes, I confirmed with the schematics. There is a 32768kHz crystal connected to the PMIC that drives the MX31 clock.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
> I haven't tried my new patch on real hardware yet, but
> I'll do that
> tomorrow and post a patch (without the do_div() fix though,
> perhaps
> someone else can do that?).
>
> /Magnus
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list