[U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

[Robert Schwebel]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it isn't
> > what you need, it is perfectly fine if you ignore it.
>
> my concern isnt really narrow to the Blackfin port. i was using it as
> a practical example. we've talked about v2 in the past as the answer
> to many of our problems and so we dont bother doing it in v1. but that
> approach looks to be wrong as v2 is of little practical importance.
> instead we should be doing what Jean-Christophe is doing: poaching
> good ideas until we get to the point where v2 can simply die.

If you mean "you" while saying "we", then yes, it may be correct that
this is your plan. "We" don't have any plans to let v2 die.

Should we be mindful of the future? But not at the expense of the
moment. Be mindful of the living Force, my young Padawan.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |