[U-Boot] [patch u-boot git arm/next] davinci: display correct clock info
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Thu Apr 30 01:17:06 CEST 2009
On 15:38 Wed 29 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
> From: David Brownell <dbrownell at users.sourceforge.net>
>
> Make the DaVinci clock display code work on the dm355 too ... there
> are pre- and post- dividers on its PLLs, which most other DaVinci
> processors don't use; and it uses different PLL dividers. Stubbed
> in support for the DM6467 too. Verified on dm355 and dm6446.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell at users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> This should move to cpu/arm926ejs/davinci (cpuinfo.c?) someday,
> like the other SoC-specific code. For another patch.
good idea
cpu.c will be better
btw a clock design as done for at91 & avr32 will be nice too
>
> board/davinci/common/misc.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/board/davinci/common/misc.c
> +++ b/board/davinci/common/misc.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,40 @@
> #include <net.h>
> #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
>
> +
> +/* offsets from PLL controller base */
> +#define PLLC_PLLCTL 0x100
> +#define PLLC_PLLM 0x110
> +#define PLLC_PREDIV 0x114
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV1 0x118
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV2 0x11c
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV3 0x120
> +#define PLLC_POSTDIV 0x128
> +#define PLLC_BPDIV 0x12c
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV4 0x160
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV5 0x164
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV6 0x168
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV8 0x170
> +#define PLLC_PLLDIV9 0x174
who will init the PLL?
can we detect it if they are already init?
> +
> +#define BIT(x) (1 << (x))
please remove
> +
> +/* SOC-specific pll info */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM355
> +#define ARM_PLLDIV PLLC_PLLDIV1
> +#define DDR_PLLDIV PLLC_PLLDIV1
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM644X
> +#define ARM_PLLDIV PLLC_PLLDIV2
> +#define DDR_PLLDIV PLLC_PLLDIV2
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM6447
> +#define ARM_PLLDIV PLLC_PLLDIV2
> +#define DDR_PLLDIV PLLC_PLLDIV1
> +#endif
> +
> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>
> int dram_init(void)
> @@ -38,16 +72,60 @@ int dram_init(void)
> return(0);
> }
>
> -static int dv_get_pllm_output(uint32_t pllm)
> +static unsigned pll_div(volatile void *pllbase, unsigned offset)
> {
> - return (pllm + 1) * (CONFIG_SYS_HZ_CLOCK / 1000000);
> + u32 div;
> +
> + div = REG(pllbase + offset);
> + return (div & BIT(15)) ? (1 + (div & 0x1f)) : 1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned pll_prediv(volatile void *pllbase)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM355
> + /* this register read seems to fail on pll0 */
maybe an errata?
> + if (pllbase == (volatile void *)DAVINCI_PLL_CNTRL0_BASE)
> + return 8;
> + else
> + return pll_div(pllbase, PLLC_PREDIV);
> +#endif
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned pll_postdiv(volatile void *pllbase)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM355
> + return pll_div(pllbase, PLLC_POSTDIV);
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM6446)
> + if (pllbase == (volatile void *)DAVINCI_PLL_CNTRL0_BASE)
> + return pll_div(pllbase, PLLC_POSTDIV);
> +#endif
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned pll_sysclk_mhz(unsigned pll_addr, unsigned div)
> +{
> + volatile void *pllbase = (volatile void *) pll_addr;
> + unsined base = CONFIG_SYS_HZ_CLOCK / 1000;
> +
> + /* the PLL might be bypassed */
> + if (REG(pllbase + PLLC_PLLCTL) & BIT(0)) {
> + base /= pll_prediv(pllbase);
> + base *= 1 + (REG(pllbase + PLLC_PLLM) & 0x0ff);
> + base /= pll_postdiv(pllbase);
> + }
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(base, 1000 * pll_div(pllbase, div));
> }
>
> void dv_display_clk_infos(void)
> {
> - printf("ARM Clock: %dMHz\n", dv_get_pllm_output(REG(PLL1_PLLM)) / 2);
> - printf("DDR Clock: %dMHz\n", dv_get_pllm_output(REG(PLL2_PLLM)) /
> - ((REG(PLL2_DIV2) & 0x1f) + 1) / 2);
> + printf("ARM Clock: %dMHz\n",
> + pll_sysclk_mhz(DAVINCI_PLL_CNTRL0_BASE, ARM_PLLDIV));
> + printf("DDR Clock: %dMHz\n",
> + /* DDR PHY uses an x2 input clock */
> + pll_sysclk_mhz(DAVINCI_PLL_CNTRL1_BASE, DDR_PLLDIV)
> + / 2);
> + printf("\n");
puts("");
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list