[U-Boot] [PATCH] stx: create common vendor hierarchy for Silicon Turnkey boards
Alex Dubov
oakad at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 5 05:09:54 CEST 2009
> >
> > Move board definition files for STx XTC, GP3 and SSA
> boards into
> > common subdirectory and factor out common code.
> >
> > "-mno-spe" flag common to all MPC85xx configurations
> does not work
> > so change it to "-mspe=no" which does (GCC bug
> 37759).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Dubov <oakad at yahoo.com>
> ...
> > --- a/board/stxgp3/Makefile
> > +++ b/board/stx/common/Makefile
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> > #
> > -# (C) Copyright 2001-2006
> > +# (C) Copyright 2006
> > # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
>
> How comes?
Git is confused somehow.
I don't see this change in my tree.
>
> > @@ -31,30 +31,34 @@
> > * LAW(Local Access Window)
> configuration:
> > *
> > * 0x0000_0000
> 0x7fff_ffff
> DDR
> 2G
> > - * 0x8000_0000
> 0x9fff_ffff PCI1
> MEM
> 512M
> > - * 0xa000_0000
> 0xbfff_ffff PCI2
> MEM
> 512M
> > + * 0x8000_0000
> 0x9fff_ffff
> PCI1
> 512M
> > + * 0xa000_0000
> 0xbfff_ffff
> PCI2
> 512M
> > + * 0xc000_0000
> 0xdfff_ffff
> RapidIO
> 512M
> > * 0xe000_0000
> 0xe000_ffff
> CCSR
> 1M
> > * 0xe200_0000
> 0xe2ff_ffff PCI1
> IO
> 16M
> > * 0xe300_0000
> 0xe3ff_ffff PCI2
> IO
> 16M
> > - * 0xf000_0000
> 0xfaff_ffff Local
> bus
> 128M
> > - * 0xfb00_0000
> 0xfb00_ffff Config
> Latch 64K
> > - * 0xfc00_0000
> 0xffff_ffff FLASH
> (boot bank) 64M
> > + * 0xf000_0000
> 0xffff_ffff LBC
> options + FLASH 256M
>
> Are you sure this is correct?
Yes, this will cover all three boards affected by the change.
They all have their address maps set in similar fashion.
>
> > struct law_entry law_table[] = {
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_SPD_EEPROM
> > - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_DDR_SDRAM_BASE,
> LAW_SIZE_128M, LAW_TRGT_IF_DDR),
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS
> > + SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS,
> LAW_SIZE_512M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI),
> > + SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_IO_PHYS,
> LAW_SIZE_16M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI),
> > #endif
> > - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS,
> LAW_SIZE_512M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1),
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS
> >
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_512M,
> LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2),
> > - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_IO_PHYS,
> LAW_SIZE_16M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1),
> >
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_16M,
> LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2),
> > - /* Map the whole localbus,
> including flash and reset latch. */
> > -
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_LBC_OPTION_BASE, LAWAR_SIZE_256M,
> LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC),
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_RIO_MEM_PHYS
> > + SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_RIO_MEM_PHYS,
> LAW_SIZE_512M, LAW_TRGT_IF_RIO),
> > +#endif
> > +
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_LBC_OPTION_BASE, LAWAR_SIZE_256M,
> LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC)
> > };
>
> This looks fishy, too.
Just look at the respective boards' law.c files before the patch.
They all have this entry, either called CONFIG_SYS_LBC_OPTION_BASE or
CONFIG_SYS_LBC_SDRAM_BASE.
> > @@ -31,76 +31,90 @@ struct fsl_e_tlb_entry tlb_table[]
> = {
> > SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR,
> >
> MAS3_SX|MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, 0,
> >
> 0, 0, BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K, 0),
> > - SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 4 * 1024 ,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 4 * 1024,
> > + SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 4 * 1024,
> > +
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 4 * 1024,
> >
> MAS3_SX|MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, 0,
> >
> 0, 0, BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K, 0),
> > - SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 8 * 1024 ,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 8 * 1024,
> > + SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 8 * 1024,
> > +
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 8 * 1024,
> >
> MAS3_SX|MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, 0,
> >
> 0, 0, BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K, 0),
> > - SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 12 * 1024 ,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 12 * 1024,
> > + SET_TLB_ENTRY(0,
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 12 * 1024,
> > +
> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + 12 * 1024,
> >
> MAS3_SX|MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, 0,
> >
> 0, 0, BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K, 0),
>
> Better split code beautifying into separate patch.
I wrote this file from scratch.
Git is confused here.
There's no separate patch.
Same for the other issues here and below.
>
>
> Hm... did you actually test these changes on all 4 boards?
There are no real changes. All three boards have nearly identical configs.
stxxtc is only copied around and is not affected by this (no tlbs or law
there).
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list