[U-Boot] [PATCH 15/17] Move eNET low-level initialisation into asm

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 24 August 2009 03:17:26 Graeme Russ wrote:
> None of these should be in the patch. Should I resubmit now or wait until
> discussion on the other parts has been finalised?

if you need to fix only one or two patches in a series, it's generally 
preferred you fix those one or two patches rather than reposting the whole 
series.  sending a v2 with the reply header set to this patch and a small 
explanation of the change is easy to do and for people to monitor.

if there's something fundamentally wrong with the series, or you made a 
mistake in just about every one, then you should respin and resubmit as a new 
thread.

posting a new series to fix only one or two things makes reviewing much harder 
as it's often unclear what has changed (and thus what exactly needs double 
checking)
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20090824/8a526094/attachment.pgp