[U-Boot] [PATCH] atngw100: Use virtual address in CONFIG_ENV_ADDR

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

Mark Jackson <mpfj-list at mimc.co.uk> wrote:
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Possibly, but NGW100 is the only one which I've seen reports about.
> > STK1000 is safe since it doesn't use the CFI driver.
> 
> I did kinda report this in the thread "JFFS2 scanning bug", and
> the "triple-revert" patch you posted on 26/05/09 16:58 appeared
> to fix it.

Ah...so it breaks JFFS2 as well? I doubt that changing the environment
address fixes that...

> Since this didn't change any board files (only the core CFI files)
> I guess I assumed this "revert" would work its way upstream and I
> wouldn't have to change anything.

Hmm, yeah, maybe I should post the revert again.

I have to admit I'm completely confused about how u-boot deals with
virtual and physical addresses these days. It used to expose only
physical addresses through external interfaces, but now it looks like
it's a bit of both, and it's impossible to tell which goes where.

> Shall I just submit a patch to fix the mimc200 board in the same way
> as your NGW100 patch ?

Yes, that will probably be a good idea if it has the same problem with
saveenv.

Haavard