[U-Boot] [PATCH] atngw100: Use virtual address in CONFIG_ENV_ADDR

[Mark Jackson]

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Mark Jackson <mpfj-list at mimc.co.uk> wrote:
>> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>>> Possibly, but NGW100 is the only one which I've seen reports about.
>>> STK1000 is safe since it doesn't use the CFI driver.
>> I did kinda report this in the thread "JFFS2 scanning bug", and
>> the "triple-revert" patch you posted on 26/05/09 16:58 appeared
>> to fix it.
> 
> Ah...so it breaks JFFS2 as well? I doubt that changing the environment
> address fixes that...
> 
>> Since this didn't change any board files (only the core CFI files)
>> I guess I assumed this "revert" would work its way upstream and I
>> wouldn't have to change anything.
> 
> Hmm, yeah, maybe I should post the revert again.
> 
> I have to admit I'm completely confused about how u-boot deals with
> virtual and physical addresses these days. It used to expose only
> physical addresses through external interfaces, but now it looks like
> it's a bit of both, and it's impossible to tell which goes where.
> 
>> Shall I just submit a patch to fix the mimc200 board in the same way
>> as your NGW100 patch ?
> 
> Yes, that will probably be a good idea if it has the same problem with
> saveenv.

Okay ... looks like there are 2 problems revolving round CFI.

(1) saveenv
(2) jffs2

The CONFIG_ENV_ADDR patch fixes (1) but *not* (2).

The "triple-revert" patch fixes both (1) and (2).


Not quite sure how to proceed from here.  For the time being, I'll go
down the "triple-revert" patch route until something better pops up !!

Regards
Mark